September 2000

THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT IS THE MONTHLY PUBLICATION OF THE ARKANSAS SOCIETY OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS. WE WELCOME ARTICLES AND ADVERTISING THAT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE GOALS AND INTEREST OF THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION. IF YOU HAVE MATERIALS TO BE PUBLISHED, PLEASE SEND THEM TO THE EDITOR AT THE ADDRESS BELOW.

LaVERNE LONG, Editor
P.O. BOX 758
NEWPORT, AR 72112-0758
llonga@ipa.net

The Arkansas Public Accountant

 

Robin Clatworthy is now officially our representative on the Arkansas State Board of Public Accountancy. If you have anything that he needs to help you with you can reach him:

 

Email: robclat@hnb.com 
Phone: (870) 829-2842 
Fax (870) 829-3162

P.O. Box 1307

Marvell, AR 72366

 


PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE

Dear Members:

 

Twenty-one years ago I was writing my first letter to you as your new president. Now I find myself in the same position. The past couple of weeks I’ve been reflecting over the changes I’ve seen since I joined ASPA in 1973. One of the most obvious is the faces I see. Several of those who served with me back then and who had such an impact on shaping our Society into the organization it is today, as well as helping me get ready for a leadership role, are with us now only in spirit.

 

Of course the first one who comes to mind would be my dad, Tom Hill, who was responsible for getting me in this organization and was my mentor in my profession; Mary Ella Smith, our first woman president, who was president when I joined; Quinton Long and Lowell Perkins, who served as presidents while I was on the Board and who were responsible for bringing us the seminars we know as “Gear Up” today; Paul Williams, who held us together as our executive secretary for years. These, as well as the ones who came before and after them worked tirelessly to help make our organization what it is today.

 

Another change I recognize is that we are no longer an organization of just public accountants. We have CPA’s, enrolled agents, attorneys, those who hold accounting degrees, and those who are not licensed but care enough about the service they provide that they want to improve themselves.  One of the main reasons these people are joining ASPA is for the quality education we provide. And no matter what title or non-title we have after our name, the important thing to remember is that we all have a common goal: to better ourselves professionally and to provide the best possible service for our clients.

 

I am proud to be a part of an organization that affords us the opportunities to do just that. Whether it’s the CPE, the interaction with other members, the rapport we try to maintain with IRS, monitoring the State Board of Public Accountancy activities, maintaining a close relationship with the National Society of Accountants, or representing you on anything else that may come up throughout the year. Your Board is always working with your best interests in mind.

 

I pledge to you that I, as well as the rest of the Board will continue to keep ASPA an organization that you will be proud to be a part of.

 

Sincerely,

Shelly F. Russell


DON’T FORGET!

GEAR UP 1040 SEMINAR DECEMBER 18 & 19, 2000.  

ROBINSON CENTER AND DOUBLE TREE HOTEL.

REGISTRATION HAS BEEN SENT

 

IF YOU HAVE NOT RECEIVED ONE, CONTACT ME. LaVerne Long,: mailto:llonga@ipa.net: Phone (870) 523-5329. (If no answer, please leave message) Fax (870) 217-0154. Regular mail: P.O. Box 758, Newport, AR 72112-0758.


NSA NEWS FROM YOUR STATE DIRECTOR - DONNA GO WAN

 

Hello! You haven’t heard from me for a while in the newsletter, but I am still here. It was good to see many of you at the convention earlier this month.

 

Your new NSA officers elected in August are President - Ralph McBride who is from Georgia; 1st Vice President - Steve Desdier from California and 2nd Vice President - Harold Krieger who is from Missouri. Terry Bayless from Idaho was elected Secretary - Treasurer. Wanda Samek from Texas was elected District VIII Governor. We were fortunate to have both Wanda and Harold at our convention and have them conduct the installation of our officers. I thank them for being here.

 

Wanda replaces our own, Donny Woods who served as District VIII Governor for four years. He represented us well and should be commended for giving so willingly of his time. Thanks Donny for a great job. I have had the opportunity to work with Wanda in the past and I know that she will do a good job also.

 

NSA has a new liability insurance program. Some of our own members are already singing the praises of this program - they have gotten more coverage for less premium. If you need information on the program, please contact me at (501) 268-5876. I have an information brochure and application form I can send to you. And if you are not a member of NSA, you may join for $99 (instead of the regular $150 membership fee) if you fill out an application for insurance at the same time. So, if you aren’t a member of NSA, take advantage of this opportunity now! If you are already a member, the insurance program is worth looking into.


WIFE NOT LIABLE for tax from business her husband ran as sole proprietor. Marvin and Barbara Barmes owned “Barbara’s Gift Shop.” Although the business was named after Barbara, their tax returns reported that Marvin operated it as a sole proprietorship. When the IRS found the business had not paid employment taxes it owed, it assessed back taxes and imposed liens against both spouses. Court: Barbara was not liable for the taxes because the business was run separately by Marvin as a sole proprietor. So the assessment and liens against her were invalid. Marvin 1. Barnes & Barbara j. Barnes, CA7, 2000-1 USTC p. 51,003.


Undercover sting operations by agencies other than the IRS can lead to special scrutiny of your tax returns. Federal agencies, including the SEC and customs, have been using undercover operations, including using cooperating witnesses who are wired, to entice targets into money laundering schemes. How it works: The undercover agent will explain that he has $50,000 in $20 bills from drug sales. The agent then asks the target to wire transfer $45,000 to another bank account in return for the $50,000 in drug money.  Fallout: After the government gets an indictment for the money laundering offense, the IRS is generally not too far behind in determining what tax crimes may have been committed.


Speculative dot-com companies and the IRS. What happens if you are an investor in a dot-com company that expects to go public within the next six months and you either die or give the stock away next week? Valuation problems have always plagued taxpayers and the IRS but now the stakes are much higher. A dot-com company that investment bankers have valued at $50 million to $75 million even before it has earned a single dollar of revenue does not fit within traditional valuation models. Expect the worst: The IRS will attempt to use a very high value based on the investment banker’s anticipated value when the company is taken public.

Best defense: Hire “creative valuation” experts who can support compelling arguments to reduce the value by applying relevant discounts.


SILENT AUCTION HUGE SUCCESS

This year’s Silent Auction held at the 55th ASPA Annual Convention at the Holiday Inn Select was a huge success. Members brought several nice items to put in the auction. The bidding was done during the annual business meeting and the first day of the accounting seminar. The total money raised this year was $524. The money raised through the auction this year together with the money raised last year enables ASPA to donate $1000 to the NSA Scholarship Foundation to help a student who is majoring in accounting. I would like to thank everyone who brought items and helped with the auction. It was a lot of fun for everyone who participated.

 

Suzanne Baltz, Chairman


REVOCABLE LIVING TRUSTS

pros & cons

 

Many promoters advertise the wonders of living trusts. Indeed, such trusts offer many advantages to their creators. But - the claims advanced for living trusts are often misleading….and sometimes just plain false. Only if you know real benefits and drawbacks of living trusts can you construct a trust with the features that best meet your client’s needs.

 

definitions

Trusts fall into two categories….

  • Living trust - established while the creator (grantor) is alive.

  • Testamentary trusts - those that go into effect after the grantor’s death, as spelled out in a will.

Living trusts are further divided into two types....

  • Revocable trusts - can be materially changed or even cancelled altogether.

  • Irrevocable trusts - can’t be rescinded after they go into effect.

A revocable trust must be a living trust, i.e., set up while you are alive. However, many types of living trusts must be irrevocable, such as an insurance trust.

 

Simply put, a revocable trust is impermanent.

 

You generally can serve as trustee and beneficiary of a revocable trust you create. Therefore, you can retain control over any assets you transfer into the trust.

 

pro living trusts

Incapacity protection. For those who become ill or incompetent, a successor trustee can take over management of the trust assets. And - there will be no costly, public, time-consuming court battle for control of your finances.

 

This type of transfer cannot be handled as seamlessly by relying on a power of attorney.

 

How it works: When you create your revocable trust and name yourself as trustee, you also select a successor trustee. You might also designate co-successors, perhaps including an institution that will assume financial responsibility.

 

Strategy: When the trust is created you should spell out the circumstances in which you no longer can manage your own affairs - and who should make that determination.

 

Example:         Two doctors have to state in writing that you are incapacitated.

 

In the event this should occur, the successor trustee can step in immediately.  And, the successor or successors will have a fiduciary responsibility to protect your interests.

 

Example:          Joe Smith’s estate was to go to his two nieces. As he grew older, he could no longer care for himself. His nieces, then could provide him with quality long-term care…or they might not, hoping to preserve Joe’s assets that they would eventually inherit.

 

Fortunately, Joe had drawn up a revocable trust, naming a bank along with the nieces as successor trustees. The trust documents required the successors to provide the best care for Joe, and the bank made sure this instruction was carried out to Joe’s comfort.

 

Vital: It’s best to go through the formalities of transferring assets into your revocable trust so the trustee will have funds to carry out required responsibilities.

 

Reality: In most states, probate is not burdensome or expensive. Many localities offer a simplified probate process that you may be able to use.

 

Many types of assets are excluded from probate anyway, whether or not you have a revocable trust.

 

Example:                      Jointly held property passes to the surviving owner automatically. Insurance proceeds and retirement accounts (including IRAs) go to the designated beneficiary.

 

Out-of-state property. If you own property in another state, your survivors will have to go through a separate probate for the out-of- state asset. That may mean hiring an attorney far away ... or making unwanted trips.

 

Holding out-of-state property in a revocable trust avoids this ancillary probate as well as local probate.

 

Trap:      Using a revocable trust to hold out-of-state property works fine for a vacation home. However, such trusts don’t provide asset protection (see below), so investment property should be held in a LLC or family limited partnership (FLP), for asset protection as well as ancillary probate avoidance.

 

Administrative rigor. One of the unsung benefits of creating a revocable trust is the need to get your affairs in order. This will help you mange your affairs as you grow older and assist your heirs in handling your estate.

 

Example:       Betty Jones created a revocable trust and began putting assets in the Betty Jones Trust. She found that she had 17 mutual funds, four brokerage accounts, and two bank accounts. In re-titling her assets, she consolidated them to a few accounts, making record keeping easier and reducing expenses.

 

drawbacks

No tax benefits. Despite what you might hear or read, revocable trusts are neutral from a tax point of view.

 

For income tax purposes, trust income is taxed to you as the grantor.

 

For estate tax purposes, assets transferred to a revocable trust are included in your taxable estate.

 

Trap:               Misinformation about revocable trusts can lead you to neglect necessary tax planning, especially when it comes to estate tax.

 

Good news: Virtually all sophisticated estate and income tax planning strategies can be used in conjunction with revocable trusts.

 

Example:      After transferring your assets into a revocable trust you can give away trust assets to reduce your taxable estate, using the $10,000 (per recipient) annual gift tax exclusion. A recent change in tax law erased doubts about this tactic.

 

No asset protection. Assets held in a revocable trust are just as vulnerable to your creditors as assets you hold personally.

 

Example:      If you hold investment property in a revocable trust, a tenant whose child eats lead paint may sue you personally for damages. As mentioned earlier, a family limited partnership or limited liability company should be used for asset protection.

 

Complacency. Merely setting up a revocable trust won’t provide you with a complete estate plan. You also should………..   

  • Take the time to re-title assets given to the trust.

  • Have a will to cover those assets not held in trust.

  • Select suitable trustees, get their agreement to serve, and make arrangements for backup trustees.

  • Work with a knowledgeable professional on tax planning.  Explain all of these arrangements to your heirs.

single or joint

 

Married couples must decide whether to use a joint revocable trust or to have each spouse create his/her own trust.

 

Individual trusts are generally best for the following reasons……….

  • Both spouses gain investment and financial experience.

  • If one spouse dies, the survivor may have easier access to the assets in his own trust than would be the case with a joint trust.

  • Each spouse builds an individual credit history.

Trap: Be wary of any attorney who tells you that the cost of creating two separate trusts will be much greater. There should be only a token extra charge.

 

For more on revocable living trusts, including a sample document, visit http://www.laweasy.com/


Lemon Drops

The local bar was so sure its bartender was the strongest man around that they offered a standing $1,000 bet. The bartender would squeeze a lemon until all the juice ran into a glass, and hand the lemon to a patron. Anyone who could squeeze one more drop of juice out would win the money. Many people had tried over time (weight lifters, longshoremen, etc.) But nobody could do it.

 

One day a scrawny little man came into the bar wearing thick glasses and a polyester suit, and said in a tiny squeaky voice, “I’d like to try the bet.” After the laughter had died down, the bartender said, “OK”, grabbed a lemon, and squeezed away. Then he handed the wrinkled remains of the rind to the little man.

 

The crowd’s laughter turned to total silence as the man clenched his fist around the lemon and six drops fell into the glass. As the crowd cheered, the bartender paid the $1,000 and asked the little man, “What do you do for a living? Are you a lumberjack, a weight lifter, what?”

 

The man replied ”I’m an IRS agent.”


THE DEATH PENALTY

 

In the United States, some states have the death penalty. A judge may sentence the accused to death if the jury finds that person guilty by unanimous consent of murder in the first degree. The sentence is handed down after many years of hearings and appeals.

 

An article written for the Los Angeles Times by Henry Chu and printed in the Star Tribune on August 2nd of this year, states that China executes more people every year than the rest of the world combined. On June 22nd of this year, a 31 year-old woman was executed by a firing squad in Beijing along with six other persons for drug trafficking. Judges in China not only hand down death sentences for murder and rape, but for bribe taking, credit card fraud on a big scale and tax evasion. Yes, tax evasion.

 

According to the article, public support for the death penalty remains high, and execution for economic crimes are extremely popular, particularly as the poor in China watch a swelling elite enrich itself through shady practices and misuse of funds. What is wealth worth if you lose your life, soul, and reputation?


Paying Taxes By Credit Card

 

The IRS says it wants taxpayers to make tax payments by credit card - for taxpayer convenience and to ease its own paperwork.

 

But unlike businesses that accept credit card charges, the IRS doesn’t give any “credit” for the processing fee collected by the credit card company - so the fee is charged in addition to the tax bill.

 

Fees vary by size of tax payment, typically 2% to 3.5%.

 

This is more than the average 1 % “reward” some credit card companies offer on charges - so tax payments charged on credit cards typically cost taxpayers extra money. This table shows how much....

 

Tax Payment

Fee

“Reward”

Net Cost

$1,000

$35

$10

$25

5,000

133

50

83

10,000

262

100

162

25,000

699

250

449

50,000

1375

500

875

99,999

2499

1000

1499

 

The result is that it is still less expensive to pay taxes the old fashioned way - by check.


Roth IRAs are being underused because people are shortsighted tax wise. Roths have an immediate tax cost compared with traditional IRAs. Contributions aren’t deductible, and conversions to Roth IRAs are taxable.

 

But people who focus on the Roth’s up-front tax costs neglect long-term tax benefits that may be much larger………  

  • Future distributions of earnings may be totally tax-free instead of taxed at ordinary rates - usually enough to make up for the current tax cost.

  • There’s no minimum distribution requirement, so funds can be invested in the Roth IRA for tax-free gains longer.

  • Roth IRAs can be used to make highly tax-favored bequests.

  • The $2,000 per year Roth IRA contributions can be withdrawn both tax and penalty free at any time for any reason.


A case can’t be dismissed for one failure to appear. A taxpayer filed a court complaint alleging the IRS had illegally placed a levy on his bank account. After he failed to appear at a hearing the court dismissed his case. Court of Appeals: The dismissal was too severe a penalty for a single such instance. The taxpayer complied with previous court orders and had a good excuse for his absence. Bruce F. Gardner, CA-DC. 2000-1 US TC p.50,484

 

Prefiling agreements can reduce audit risk for small businesses.

Until not such agreements have been available only to large corporations. The agreements manage factual mailers that otherwise could lead to audit disputes. Example: In the newly expanded tip reporting program, employers agree to educate employees about the need to report tips in income. The IRS then agrees not to conduct tip reporting audits. The new Voluntary Agreements on Compliance will be offered industry wide through the office of the IRS’s new Small Business/Self-Employed Division.

 

Beware of state tax traps when you telecommute across state lines.

If you provide services in your “home” state for your employer located in another state, then that other state may try to tax you even if you never go there. New York recently held that a Pennsylvania man who worked for a New York company from his home in Pennsylvania owes New York nonresident income tax.

 

Burden of proof defeats tax lien. The IRS tried to enforce a $1.4 million lien against a taxpayer whom it said had under reported business income. But the taxpayer argued the IRS tax assessment was unsupported. Court: The IRS’s main evidence was a Revenue Agent’s report analyzing the taxpayer’s business records - but it couldn’t be verified because the IRS had lost the records it was based on. Similarly, other work papers presented by IRS could not be independently verified. Thus, IRS had failed to present “the minimum factual foundation” needed to shift the burden of proof regarding unreported income to the taxpayer, and the lien was not enforced. Gilbert Mark Crisp, E.D., Ca., 2000 - 1 USTC p. 50,130.  

Newsletter | By Laws | Officers & Governors | Membership Types | Event Calendar | Information Links | Contact
Entire Contents Copyright © 2000 Arkansas Society of Public Accountants. All Rights Reserved.
Legal Notice

RETURN TO MAIN SITE